<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consultants Weigh In on Thorny Ethical Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.confabusa.org/confab08/consultants-weigh-in-on-thorny-ethical-problems/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.confabusa.org/confab08/consultants-weigh-in-on-thorny-ethical-problems</link>
	<description>For successful consultants, and those who want to be</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.confabusa.org/confab08/consultants-weigh-in-on-thorny-ethical-problems/comment-page-1#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confabusa.org/?p=1268#comment-435</guid>
		<description>As a participant I will say that many people remarked later about this discussion, I vote for more but far more controversial issues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a participant I will say that many people remarked later about this discussion, I vote for more but far more controversial issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Mandelberg</title>
		<link>http://www.confabusa.org/confab08/consultants-weigh-in-on-thorny-ethical-problems/comment-page-1#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Mandelberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confabusa.org/?p=1268#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I thought this was an excellent session, one that was too long in coming. I am aligned with Jim on this - May I have some more please? There are beau-coup scenarios with serious ethical and financial considerations - I would like to see us explore them more deeply. The best example of this I have seen involved several people playing different roles within a fictitious company, each explaining their position and situation. They debated a bit with each others as the story unfolded, and ultimately the audience was left with the opportunity to query the  &#039;employees&#039; and come to thier own conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was an excellent session, one that was too long in coming. I am aligned with Jim on this &#8211; May I have some more please? There are beau-coup scenarios with serious ethical and financial considerations &#8211; I would like to see us explore them more deeply. The best example of this I have seen involved several people playing different roles within a fictitious company, each explaining their position and situation. They debated a bit with each others as the story unfolded, and ultimately the audience was left with the opportunity to query the  &#8216;employees&#8217; and come to thier own conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Beever, CMC</title>
		<link>http://www.confabusa.org/confab08/consultants-weigh-in-on-thorny-ethical-problems/comment-page-1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Beever, CMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confabusa.org/?p=1268#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Jennifer, thanks for your comment. As the Confab live blogger, I apologize for misstating your view about the Medicare Practice ethics case study! I learned some interesting things about live blogging during Confab, including that live bloggers should set up blog entries with session title and speaker info with links to the speakers&#039; web sites, etc., in advance so they can better listen to the content during the session. :)

I agree with Jim&#039;s comment that we should do the panel discussion of ethics case studies again! This discussion of ethics is one of the best I&#039;ve heard at Confab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer, thanks for your comment. As the Confab live blogger, I apologize for misstating your view about the Medicare Practice ethics case study! I learned some interesting things about live blogging during Confab, including that live bloggers should set up blog entries with session title and speaker info with links to the speakers&#8217; web sites, etc., in advance so they can better listen to the content during the session. <img src='http://www.confabusa.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I agree with Jim&#8217;s comment that we should do the panel discussion of ethics case studies again! This discussion of ethics is one of the best I&#8217;ve heard at Confab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Leake</title>
		<link>http://www.confabusa.org/confab08/consultants-weigh-in-on-thorny-ethical-problems/comment-page-1#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Leake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confabusa.org/?p=1268#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great report on our session at Confab.  (For those who missed this conference, you missed a great time of learning and networking!)  A slight correction on my viewpoint of the case study I represented in the ethics session.  As a former pharmacist, I have an insight into the billing and practices of medical care and felt the consultant in the case study (not me) showed a bias, causing me to reference the Code of Ethics section on objectivity and bias.  I felt many others might share this bias (which was supported by audience comments - guilt on the part of not only this medical practice despite limited information and no evidence to support fraud, but the medical community in general) and again emphasized the Code of Ethics point on this matter.  Jennifer Leake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great report on our session at Confab.  (For those who missed this conference, you missed a great time of learning and networking!)  A slight correction on my viewpoint of the case study I represented in the ethics session.  As a former pharmacist, I have an insight into the billing and practices of medical care and felt the consultant in the case study (not me) showed a bias, causing me to reference the Code of Ethics section on objectivity and bias.  I felt many others might share this bias (which was supported by audience comments &#8211; guilt on the part of not only this medical practice despite limited information and no evidence to support fraud, but the medical community in general) and again emphasized the Code of Ethics point on this matter.  Jennifer Leake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim soudriette</title>
		<link>http://www.confabusa.org/confab08/consultants-weigh-in-on-thorny-ethical-problems/comment-page-1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim soudriette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.confabusa.org/?p=1268#comment-62</guid>
		<description>As a participant I will say that many people remarked later about this discussion
I vote for more but far more contraversal issues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a participant I will say that many people remarked later about this discussion<br />
I vote for more but far more contraversal issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
